My Photo

Fair Verona, where we lay our scene...

  • MASTER OF VERONA cover
    These are images of Verona and the surrounding areas, all having to do with the novel The Master of Verona.

July 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    
Blog powered by TypePad

Mercutio

The Beginning of the End

The other day I was here writing about endings. Then, the very next day, I was off-project thanks to a beginning. The irony is amusing, if not epic.

I was supposed to be working on the new (Roman) novel. But while in the shower I had realized how the final book of the Mercutio series begins. I thought I knew before, but I was dead wrong. So I towelled off and sat down, in the space of two hours churning out 3,000 words. The prologue of the final novel is writ.

Now I just have to finish the intervening nine books and we'll be all set.

Sigh. Back to Roma.

Dante Biography

Monday being the Actor Day Of Rest, I got to relax and hang out in Ann Arbor. Did some work on various writing projects, some related to the Mercutio series (as this is rapidly becoming known - Star-Cross'd was my first choice, but it sounds too much like a Romance series, doesn't it?), and some not.

But everything halted when the post arrived at noon. Dash was down for his nap, so I was free to open the package from the Amazon affiliate. It contained Barbara Reynolds new biography of the infernal poet, entitled DANTE - The Poet, The Political Thinker, The Man.

I cracked it right away. All I can say is, where was this book seven years ago? I'm only three chapters in, but already I've found a wealth of detail about the man, the age, and the arts. An exciting read (at least to me), I'm fascinated by her take on the poet and his attitudes. I'm also broken-hearted that Dante will never play a large part in the main story after the first book - though this makes me more determined than ever to write the interquel novel, DXV. I now have more ideas than ever for Dante's interaction with young Mercutio. I'm gonna need to do something with those ideas, or I'll split right down the middle.

The other joy, though, in reading this, is so far I have found nothing that directly contradicts my own take on Dante and his family. I may be a little fanciful in my rendering of the Alighieri family, but so far as I know I have stayed true to the essence of their story.

So, if you're out there counting the days until THE MASTER OF VERONA is released, I would highly reccommend Ms. Reynolds' book to fill the void.

Cheers,

DB

Friar Lawrence - Culpable

    A couple days ago I reconnected with Harlan Underhill, my high school Shakespeare teacher from half a lifetime ago. Harlan was also the co-director of my very first production of the Bard's work (of course, it was Romeo & Juliet. And, yes, I played Mercutio).
    He and I wrote back and forth about the book, but he said he was thinking of me because he was involved in a discussion of why Romeo and Juliet don't just run off together in the middle of the show.
    It's a question that always gets to me - in fact, makes me angry. Not at the play, or at the person asking the question. No, I get mad at a single character in the show. Friar Lawrence.
    I hate the Friar. Not as a role. As a person.
    There was a musical running here in Chicago a couple years back - I believe it was a Second City script, performed at CST on Navy Pier - that was something about the Trial of Friar Lawrence. They humerously blame him for everything that goes wrong in R&J.
    But to me, that's not a joke. It's the God's honest truth. The blame falls squarely on the Friar's shoulders. Everything he does - and I mean everything! - is done in secret, behind men's backs. It is not a flattering portrayal of ecclesiastic meddling. I grant that the secret wedding is well within the bounds of a normal Shakespeare play, Comedy or Tragedy (Othello comes to mind).
    But the moment Tybalt is killed, the Friar should be on his way to the Prince. "My lord Escalus - these children are married. Do what you can for them." But it doesn't seem to occur to him. Instead he comes up with a plan so that Romeo can have his wedding night, then ditch town. Romantic, perhaps. But hardly practical - except in a man devoted to secrecy, and afraid of being caught.
    Why don't Romeo and Juliet flee at that moment? Because of the Friar's counsel. He's the wise authority figure, the man of years. Of course they listen to him.
    Then comes the moment when Juliet comes to him, threatening to kill herself unless he can prevent her marraige to Paris. Lawrence swipes a page from Friar Francis in Much Ado - fake her death! Now, if it's me (Friar Dave, as it were) here's my plan: "Juliet, I've got a horse out back. Let's get you out of town." But no, much better to drug her. That way, the secret is still safe.
    But the thing I detest the Friar for the most, the single act that I cannot forgive him for, is what happens in the tomb. Discovering Romeo and Paris slain, he hears a noise and fears discovery. He tells the groggy and terrified Juliet to come with him - "I'll dispose of you among a sisterhood of holy nuns!" Even now he's fearful of the story coming out. Then he does the unforgivable thing - he leaves her. "I dare no longer stay!" The cowardly friar shows his true color - yellow. The man responsible for her situation, this wise man of years, runs away, leaving a thirteen year-old girl in her family crypt beside the corpses of her cousin, her fiancee, and her husband. Honestly, what does he think will happen?
    It is my sincere hope (and my strict direction when I'm in charge of a production) that when the Prince says some shall be "punished," he's looking directly at Friar Lawrence.
    I've played most of the male roles in this show (excluding only the Prince, Paris, and Benvolio, I think). And there is great fun to be had in them all, and Lawrence is no exception. The Friar is a great character to perform. I just loathe him as a person.
    Why? Why love Mercutio and revile the Friar? Easy. While Mercutio is wild and trouble, playing the catalyst in the precipitating event, the disaster that follows is entirely due to the secrecy and fear that pervades the character of Friar Lawrence.

Gigs

As I finish work on the sequel, I'm lining up theatrical work for the rest of the year. Up next, I'll be directing THE COMPLEAT WRKS OF WLLM SHKSPR (abridged) at Noble Fool Theatricals in St. Charles. This job fell into my lap out of the blue. I have produced this show five or six times by now, first in and around Ann Arbor, most recently here in Chicago, first at CityLit, then a long and much-loved run at the Mercury Theatre. After so many years with the show, I thought I was pretty much done with it. But then Noble Fool asked if we could remount our production once again, and bring it to them. It's good money, and that show is loads of fun. I won't be acting in it this time (I've joined the actor's union this year, so I couldn't even if I wanted to), but the cast we've got I'm very excited about.

The other reason I can't do the show is that while they're finishing the run at St. Charles, I'll be in Michigan for my first extended stay in seven years. I'll be rehearsing and performing at the Michigan Shakespeare Festival, playing the Scottish king in MACBETH and choreographing the fights for HENRY V. This, too, fell into my lap out of a clear blue sky. I got an e-mail early in January from my old friend, John Neville Andrews. He asked if I was interested in the Scottish king. Now, 2007 is the first year since 2001 that I haven't played Macbeth for some company. So I was excited to say yes, thus keeping my streak alive. Hell, I played Mac the day Dash came home from the hospital, a whole five days old.

In fact, Mac is quick coming to rival Mercutio as the role I've most often played. And the good thing about Mac, for me, is that I have another couple of decades that I'll be able to play him. Unlike Mercutio, who is all but behind me now. Which is for the best. I spent too many years with my ego wrapped around that role. Hell, I've devoted how much of my life to writing his life's story? Because that's what this book and the sequels are all about - Mercutio's story.

Ha - didn't think I'd get back around to the novel, did you? Shame. For me, it all comes back to the novel. In fact, I'll be pulling double-duty this summer. Acting Mac on the weekends, promoting the book the rest of the time. Because the book comes out the week after the shows open. Proving I want to drop dead from exhaustion.

-DB

A Comedy - Part 1

The Tragedy of Romeo & Juliet is not a Tragedy at all.

Each time I’ve seen it done, I’ve thought the various directors (with all due respect) missed the boat. Why? Because the show isn’t a Tragedy. A Tragedy, in the classical sense, revolves around a single central character, usually male, who is a paragon of virtues – a great lover, poet, warrior, philosopher, politician – with a single flaw that invariably leads to ultimate destruction of the lead and all they stand for. With Othello it’s jealousy, with Mac it’s ambition, and so on.

That doesn’t fit Romeo. He’s much more of an Orlando, a Claudio. He’s the lovesick youth from Shakespeare’s Comedies. Juliet, for her part, isn’t an Ophelia or a Desdemona. She’s Rosalind, she’s – well, not Hero, she’s smarter and more active. She’s a Viola. Young and in love, she remains the smartest, most charming and grounded person in the show. Her only flaw, if it is a flaw, is falling in love.

R&J doesn’t follow the format of a Tragedy, either. You can tell just by the opening. Look at the first scene of most any other great Shakespearean Tragedy and you’ll find Witches, or Storms, or Battles, or Ghosts, or all of the above.

Not in R&J! Setting aside the Prologue, which I’ll get to, the show begins with jokes about sex and violence. “I’ll push Montague’s men from the wall and thrust his maids to the wall!” Imagine a teenage pelvic thrust on the last part of the line and you’ve got the idea.

So it starts like a Comedy, its leads are comedic leads. I wondered where that notion could lead me.

-DB

Dates

Those who have studied Shakespeare’s sources will be critical of my choice of years. As I’ve stated earlier, Luigi da Porto, whose version of the story was penned in the early 16th Century, firmly places the events of the play between 1301 and 1304. This is during the reign of Bartolomeo della Scala, Cangrande’s older brother. Working backwards from there, the events of this book would have taken place about 1276. While this is a fascinating period in Veronese history, with such notable characters as Mastino della Scala (the first) and Ezzelino da Romano (the third), for me it lacked the drama of the Fall of Verona. Verona reaches its greatest heights under Cangrande. That gives it so much farther to fall.

I claim da Porto was misinformed. The feud between the Montecchi and the original Capelletti was indeed buried in 1302, when Gargano Montecchio and his uncles slaughtered the last of the Capelletti in the Arena in Verona. But I have it flare up again in 1315 when another noble family takes up the Capulet name. It will not die for another twenty-five years, when Verona loses everything it holds dear.

Why? Because the horror of Shakespeare's play isn't just the demise of the young lovers, but also the death of every young knight in the city. The flower of Verona's youth is blighted in a single week. For Mariotto Montecchio and Antonio Capulletto, it is very truly a plague on both their houses, but the scourge takes other lives as well. The Prince loses a brace of kinsmen, Mercutio and Paris. From the height that Cangrande lifts it to, Verona falls, never to rise again.

Prologue - pt. 2

        In another quarter of an hour Ciolo found the house, right where it was supposed to be. There was the hanging garden. There was the juniper bush. The house was frescoed with a pagan god holding a staff with two snakes on it. The god was between two barred windows and above two massive lead rings for tethering horses. Just as described.

        The front of the house had torches burning, and Ciolo passed through the flickering light, walking drunkenly in case anyone was watching. He’d been told there was no possible entrance from the ground, so Ciolo didn’t waste time looking for one. Instead he circled the block until he came to a three story wall outside a dyeyard. The wall’s covering plaster had worn away at the street level, showing the mix of round stones and proper bricks that made the wall. It was dark in this street, the light from the stars the only illumination. Still playing the drunkard, he stood in the open, loosened the points on his hose, and relieved himself against the wall. Using his free hand to lean against the wall, his fingers quested. No one passed, not even a cat. Readjusting his points he rubbed his hands together and, having found the promised fingerholds, he began his ascent.

        Along the top were curved spikes to keep intruders out of the dyeyard. But Ciolo didn’t want in. He wanted passage. Reaching up one hand he carefully wrapped his fingers around the inch-thick base of the spike. He didn’t put much pressure on it at first. It might be sharpened along its whole length, not just at the curve. But in this too his instructions were accurate. The flat edges of the spike were dull. Ciolo gripped the spike harder, praying it would bear his whole weight. It did. He swung his free hand up to grasp the next spike. Then the next. Hand over hand he passed down the row of spikes, around the shadowed corner between two houses.

        By now his breath was coming hard, his hands and shoulders aching sourly. But he only had another half length of the wall to travel. He started on it, then froze as a noise came from the house behind him. Did they have dogs? Or, worse, geese? Pressing himself against the high wall, feeling his sweaty fingers slip, he wished for a cloud to hide the stars and plunge him into deeper shadow. Ciolo listened.

        It was a child. A child’s cry in the night. Unattended, it went uncomforted.

        Ciolo glanced over his shoulder. It came from the house he was aiming for. In a perfect world he could have waited for the child to sleep again. But his hands were losing their strength. He continued quickly down the final length of the wall, mouthing foul pleas not to slip. The next move was tricky – he had to twist around until he was hanging with his back against the high wall and leap to a window across the four foot divide. He doubled up his grip with his one hand, then twisted around and threw up his free hand. It brushed past one bar, but firmly found the next. Now he was facing his target, an arched window. It was open, the wooden door swung wide. He knew the longer he waited the worse his nerves would get. Ciolo curled his feet up to press against the wall at his back, released the bars, and pushed off hard.

        His ribs banged against the windowsill. He hit his chin as he began to slip. Flinging his arms wide, he pressed his elbows against the inside walls. His feet scrambling he pulled himself awkwardly over the lip and into the house.

        Crouching low beside the window, Ciolo found himself in a long hall, narrow, with a pair of doors on each side. He squinted until he was sure all the doors were closed. He felt like his breathing was making more noise than a bellows. But no alarums. No cries but for the child, which were subsiding. If someone came now he would be useless, his arms were shaking so fiercely. He flexed and stretched, each second gaining him another breath, each breath easing his beating heart. His eyes began to play tricks on him in the dark. He imagined that the doors were all open, and twice he swore he saw movement. But each time he was wrong. Or he hoped he was.

        After two or three minutes of watching from the shadowy corner by the window Ciolo was as ready as he was going to be. His right hand dropped to his left hip. Gripping the leather-wrapped hilt he withdrew a dagger nine inches long.

        Keeping well out of the little light coming in the window he made his way down the hall. Based on the plan of the house Ciolo had memorized, he had not far to go. Down this hall, a right turn into a grand room, and up a single flight to a double door. Simple.

        The hallway was tiled and clear of rushes. Ciolo placed first one foot then another, so much on his toes that his boot-heels hardly brushed the floor. He came to the pair of doors facing each other. Both were closed. Holding his breath he picked up the pace past them. Nothing leapt out at him. He sighed a little and instantly cursed himself for the slight noise.

        The second pair of doors were also closed. Again, everything was proceeding apace. He forced himself to stop and listen. One flight up the infant was still making noise, but the rest of the house was still.

        Fortune favors the bold, thought Ciolo. He crept around the corner, feeling along the wall for the beginning of the stairs. Tripping would be bad.

        Most stairs creaked, but Ciolo kept his weight to the far outsides of each step where the wood was unlikely to bend. At the top of the stair there was another window, facing north. He could see the sliver of the moon, and it could see him. He crouched down, his back to the wall, and looked for the double doors.

        There they were. The light from the partial moon just brushed their bottom edges. Staying out of the light Ciolo pressed himself up to one side of the doors. Inside he could hear the child. It was neither wailing nor giggling. More of a string of burbling noises. Ciolo thought the room must be small because he could hear an echo, as if child’s own voice was answering itself.

        Ciolo waited, listening to the room beyond the doors. Was there a nurse waiting with the baby? Surely not. Or else she was dead to the world. And soon would be moreso. Ciolo smiled and trained his eyes on the moonlight. He prayed to a merciful God to send a cloud, then on second thought redirected the entreaty to the Fiend.

        Whoever heard his prayer, it was answered almost at once. The light crept away. Once it was dim Ciolo moved swiftly. Lifting his knife he grasped the handle of the nearest door to the child’s room and pulled.

        Darkness within. Ciolo stood to one side of the doorway, pausing for his eyes to adjust to the more complete darkness within. Still the child burbled. Ciolo squinted at the corner the noise was coming from and thought he saw an outline. Ciolo reversed his dagger from point up to point down – a stabbing grip. Then he stepped fully into the gap, one hand on the doorframe to guide him into the room.

        There was a movement in the corner. A sharp cracking noise made Ciolo wince. Instantly the breath exploded from his body. Confused, he found himself sprawled several feet back down the hallway. Something had hit him in the chest, hit him hard enough to stun him. His free hand came up and found a thin line of wood protruding from his breastbone. His fingers brushed the fletched end absently. He whimpered, afraid to pull on the arrow’s shaft.

        A hinge creaked as the second door opened. Light appeared as a shuttered lantern was unveiled. The light approached, growing brighter. To Ciolo’s dazed eyes to seemed to be borne in the hands of an angel. He blinked away the shapes that were creeping into his vision. She was still there, standing above him now. An angel all in white. The color of mourning.

        "Not dead, then?" asked a voice. "Good."

        “Holy Madonna...” he sputtered, the blood on his lips leaving the taste of metal on his tongue.

        “Shhh.” The angel set aside both the candle and the instrument of his demise, a small trigger-bow. Her arm must have been hurt firing it, for she used her off hand to take the blade from his unresisting grasp.

        Behind her was another shape, a young girl clutching a baby. The baby Ciolo had come to murder. He didn’t know if it was a boy or girl, it was too young to tell and he’d never asked. He wanted to ask now, but breathing was trouble enough. Still his mouth tried to work at the words.

        The woman shook her head. With a lilting accent Ciolo found beautiful, she said, “Say nothing except the name of the man who paid you.”

        “I – I don’t…”

        “Not a good answer, love.”

        “But – madonna forgive me, but – it was a woman.”

        The angel nodded but didn’t smile. Ciolo wanted her to smile. He was dying. He wanted absolution – something. “Angel, forgive me.”

        “Ask forgiveness of God, man – not of me.”

        His own knife flashed left to right in her pale hand. He made the effort to close his eyes so as not to see his life’s blood spill to the floor. With a choked whimper, Ciolo lay still.

*                  *                     *                     *                    *                    *

End of Prologue

Genesis of the novel - pt. 2

Not happy with how the novel was progressing, I fought halfway through a bad version before I realized I wasn’t writing the story I wanted to tell.

More research, more false starts. Finally I took a deep breath and settled in to read Dante’s Divine Comedy, something I would have bet money against at any other point in my life. It wasn’t the great revelation Shakespeare was, but it did give me the landscape of the time. And halfway through Dante knocked my socks off by mentioning the feud between the Capelletti and the Montecchi. Capulet and Montagues, anyone?

In reading both the history of the period and the footnotes to Dante’s work, one man’s name kept cropping up. A man who stood above all his peers, outshone the luminaries of his day. Giotto’s patron, Dante’s friend. A man fit to be a tragic hero of one of Shakespeare’s plays. His name was Cangrande della Scala, but he was also known as the Greyhound of Verona. Revered as almost a God in his own lifetime, the man took Verona to its highest height, just before its worst fall.

Tall and handsome, with a smile famous for its joy and perfect set of teeth, he was successful in everything he did – warrior, lover, reveler, patron of the arts. Under his rule Verona was a hub of commercial and artistic growth. It was also hated and feared by its neighbors. Venice conspired against Cangrande, as did popes and emperors. He waged an almost-unceasing war with nearby Padua for twenty years, finally winning through benevolence, not battle.

Cangrande’s life fascinated me as much as any play I’d ever read. Because he reminded me of someone, a rogue I had fallen in love with the first time I played him. The ties between Shakespeare and Dante were growing.

Soon I was reading about Dante himself – his wit, his loves, his politics, his exile, his family. It was then that it happened – one of those moments you hear writers talk about, where a character steps off the page and introduces himself as the lead.

Pietro Alighieri, also known as Pietro di Dante. Barely eighteen when my story starts, he came upon the scene and knocked down all my plans, which is very unlike him because he’s a good guy. A really good guy, the kind of guy I’d want to play if I didn’t enjoy scoundrels so much. Raised in his father’s ever-growing shadow, he was a prospectless second son until the death of his elder brother elevated him to heir.

With no particular skill in anything, just great heart and determination, he gave the book its voice. For the sake of my narrative I move away from Pietro now and again, but Pietro’s experience is ours, and we can watch in his growth, feel pride in his achievements, and share his disillusionments.

But there was another element missing. If the idea for the feud was going to become the subplot, a crucial but subdued backdrop, where was my plot? What was my spine? The book seemed to be writing itself, everything falling into place, and still I didn’t know what Pietro’s goal was.

All good actors, when they are lost, return to the text. That goes for directors and, it seems, writers. I sat down and once again poured through the story of the star-cross’d lovers.

Then it came, the answer. In my mind, the Bard of Avon chuckled as he met Dante’s son and gave him his raison d’etre. I had come full circle, the best of all possible worlds.

Mercutio. Of course, Mercutio. Referred to as both a cousin to the Prince, and ‘the Prince’s near ally,’ Mercutio was in some way tied to the della Scala family. The pivotal figure of Romeo & Juliet would be only a newborn babe when my story began. We couldn’t follow him, not from the outset – following the adventures of a toddler in fourteenth century Italy is not what I call exciting. But following the trials and tribulations of his protector, young Pietro Alighieri – that had promise!

All at once it was Mercutio’s story. The possibility of creating from Shakespeare’s text and real history the tale of this marvelously troubled young man was just too tempting. I could explain the darkness in the Queen Mab speech, from his disdain of love and his homoerotic tendencies to his fear of war drums and his foul images of childbirth. Shakespeare’s Mercutio has a wealth of possibility, and if I could tap even a little of it, I had the makings of a great story.

Moreover, bringing it back to Shakespeare led me to look at the phrase ‘star-cross’d,’ which carries elements of both prophecy and futility. Looking closely, Mercutio is the agent of the stars, because his death is what leads the young lovers to their fate. So Mercutio is a tool of the heavens.

Dante uses prophecy often. The Inferno begins with a retooling of an ancient one regarding the mythical Greyhound, a man who will save Italy and take it into another age. I knew from my reading that scholars have often speculated that Dante was referring to Cangrande – but what if he meant someone else?

Here I was faced with a decision – can I bring the prophecies of Shakespeare and Dante together, roll them together, and slap them on a defenseless child still in his crib? Am I that cruel?

Turns out I am. Researching astrology and numerology, I came up with a prophetic doom revolving around Dante’s Greyhound that all my characters could struggle against, in vain. With the advantage of hindsight, I can say that the ‘new age of man’ alluded to in the Greyhound prophecy was the Renaissance.

The stars aligned, the story poured out. A year for the first draft, then six months for the next, and the next. Once into the thick of it, I started seeing connections with the Bard's other Italian plays. Characters and events from The Taming of the Shrew are actually mentioned in R&J, so Kate and Petruchio make cameo appearances. There are characters from Two Gentlemen of Verona, of course, but others as well – Shylock, Don Pedro of Aragon and his nasty bastard brother. The Duke from Measure for Measure (also an Escalus) is mentioned in passing. And what Italian story can miss references to Caesar and Cleopatra? I even manage a thinly veiled Mac reference. The original idea of the Montague/Capulet feud blossomed into a panoramic story about Shakespeare’s characters living in Dante’s world.

It's a world I look forward to sharing.

Thanks for My Life

I always hated Shakespeare.

They made me read him. In junior high, it was Julius Caesar. In high school, first it was Romeo & Juliet, which was cool only because we wasted a week watching the movie – the Zefferelli, not the DeCaprio version. The next year it was Henry IV Part One, to which I said ‘you’ve got to be kidding’ and scraped through the test by listening to class discussions.

The Bard of Avon and I were not friendly. So how did I happen to write a novel exploring his works?

It started my senior year in high school, when I had a choice between a reading-Shakespeare and an acting-Shakespeare class. I’d already done a lot of acting by then, so it was a no-brainer. As it happened, the teachers of the course had chosen Romeo & Juliet to do that year, mainly because they had a Juliet in mind. I remembered from the film that Mercutio was the best part in the show, and after auditioning against the rest of the class, I landed the part.

It was somewhere in the middle of rehearsals when everything clicked. The teachers of those other classes had been holding out on me all these years. You don’t read Shakespeare – you perform him! It’s not literature to be scanned, but language to be spoken by real, living, breathing people. Playing one of his characters, I discovered that Shakespeare had crafted the best expression of what it is to be alive.

Thus started my love affair with the Bard of Avon. High school led to community theatre and college shows, then professional outdoor Shakespeare productions. Today I am a Shakespearean actor, something I would never have believed a dozen years ago. I’ve performed over 30 full productions of a dozen of his plays, including the leads in Macbeth, Much Ado About Nothing, Twelfth Night, A Midsummer Night’s Dream, A Comedy of Errors, As You Like It, Edward III, Julius Caesar, and Hamlet. I’ve played on stages like Chicago Shakespeare Theatre and The Goodman, prodded by world-famous directors beside actors the caliber of Mike Nussbaum and Stacey Keach.

So Shakespeare gave me a career. Then he did me one better and introduced me to my wife. Jan and I met playing Kate and Petruchio in The Taming of the Shrew, giving us banter material for the rest of our lives.

And then, as if all that were not enough, Shakespeare got me to write a book.

Once again it starts with Romeo & Juliet. I’ve long been of the opinion that directors miss the point of the show. I like to compare it to the premiere of Snow White and the Seven Dwarves in 1937. Before the film was released, it was called ‘Disney’s Folly.’ Who was going to sit through a feature-length cartoon? Insanity! But grown men and women left the premiere of the film crying, the critics went nuts with praise, every song became a top 10 hit, and theatre owners were forced to change seat-covers after every showing because of kids wetting themselves in terror. No one had ever seen anything like it.

That’s what I think Romeo & Juliet was for the mid-1590s. It’s not a Tragedy. It bears no resemblance to Hamlet or Othello or the Scottish Play. It’s something much worse – a Comedy that goes wrong. The horror lies in the fact that first the play makes us laugh, then pulls the rug out, leaving us all confused and bewildered.

I expressed my views a few times, and suddenly found myself approached to direct the show. Warily, I accepted. It was my first time directing Shakespeare. I read old versions of the play and Shakespeare’s source materials. I poured through the whole text in a way I’d never done as an actor. Poking around for lines to cut, I found something.

I found a cause for the feud.

I may not be the first ever to see it, but I’ve certainly never heard it anywhere else. It’s oblique, and doesn’t really affect the action of the play, but nevertheless, once the idea got hold of me I couldn’t let it go.

Thus a book was born.

It was going to be a short book, romantic and sad, just to get the idea out of my system. So I started to do a little research, mostly about Verona – the history, the culture. I discovered some facts. At the time the tale of the star-cross’d lovers supposedly took place, a few interesting people were in Verona. Dante, the father of Renaissance literature. Giotto, the father of Renaissance painting. Petrarch, the poet who technically started the Renaissance by finding Cicero’s letters. So, in a very real sense, the Renaissance began in Verona at the start of the fourteenth century.

I then settled in to read Dante’s Divine Comedy, something I would have bet money against at any other point in my life. I won’t say it was easy – it wasn’t the great revelation Shakespeare was – but it did give me the landscape of the time. And halfway through Purgatorio Dante knocked my socks off by mentioning a feud between the Capelletti and the Montecchi. Capulet and Montagues, anyone?

Yet, in both the histories and Dante’s work, one man’s name kept cropping up. A man who stood above all his peers, outshone the luminaries of his day. Giotto’s patron, Dante’s friend. A man fit to be a tragic hero of one of Shakespeare's plays. His name was Cangrande della Scala, but he was also known as the Greyhound, the Master of Verona.

The feud became a mere backdrop to a larger tale, revolving around this incredible man. Because he reminded me of someone, a rogue I had fallen in love with the first time I played him. A character I’ve been asked to perform more times than any other. In the play, it is said that Mercutio is both a cousin to the Prince, and “the Prince’s near ally.” The Prince in the play is named Escaulus, the Latin version of della Scala. Cangrande was related, somehow, to Mercutio, my favorite role.

So it came full circle. The real people of Dante’s time met the characters of Shakespeare’s plays, allowing me to explore one of the most enigmatic characters the Bard ever wrote.

                         *                      *                      *                      *                     

I read somewhere that when Alan Alda met Donald Sutherland, he simply took the other man’s hand and said, “Thank you for my life.” If Shakespeare were alive today, I’m sure that’s what I’d have to say.

But I'd start by telling him how I'd always hated him.

                                                                                                                   - DB